What's happening to this poor woman?
Answer is here.
Or behind the jump.
More in extended >>
"GET ACTUAL THRILL SENSATION USING SPONGO"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea426/ea426d849618025b528ac8728d8671c8f16728cd" alt=""
image source: Smithsonian
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f950/5f950b452b06bf036375318d062e30b0eb2d5478" alt=""
Wilkes-Barre Times Leader - May 25, 1938
What does this machine do? Hint: it looks enormously overdesigned for its simple function.
The answer is here.
Or after the jump.
More in extended >>
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c96d1/c96d15a70a7e8b41c627c097e0b648c0dbf20f54" alt=""
Popular Mechanics - June 1936
Jalopnik draws attention to a similar, but sturdier-looking "bird's dog palace," also supported by a running board.
The "animal keyboard," introduced by Smith Corona in the mid-1930s, was designed to teach children how to type by having pictures of animals on the keys of the typewriter. As explained by Merritt Ierley in his book
Wondrous Contrivances:
The idea was to teach children to type by having the keys labeled for different animals. Hence, on the left hand, as the instruction book explained, “Little finger is birdie finger, third finger is doggie finger, second finger is bunnie finger,” and so on for each hand. As an added help, there was a matching animal ring for each finger. Despite its innovative charm, the animal keyboard seems to have had a short run and is virtually forgotten today except for one in the Smithsonian Institution.
The
Antikey Chop website provides even more info about the animal keyboard, but I must be missing the point because I don't understand how having pictures of animals on the keys would make it any easier to learn how to type.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fc69/6fc6904b6f8b53398bbf7b1ed075c664c2d70097" alt=""
Allentown Morning Call - Jan 7, 1937
In the
May 1930 issue of Popular Science magazine, Thomas Elway advanced the unusual hypothesis that Mars was inhabited by a race of beavers. His idea was subsequently reported in many newspapers.
As far as I can tell, Elway wasn't actually a scientist. He was a journalist. So perhaps one shouldn't attach too much weight to his opinion. Still, he gets points for creativity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bfb2/0bfb277a388badc8390a27326689f7ee03bba4f1" alt=""
Semi-Weekly Spokesman Review - Oct 12, 1930
Elway's argument was based on the assumption (widespread at the time) that there was plant life on Mars. Therefore, animal life was also considered possible. His reasoning then proceeded as follows:
So far, everything runs strikingly parallel with evolution on earth. It is probable that it will be found to have run parallel farther still and that animal life on both planets, too, has been similar — for at least part of the evolutionary story. But during all the years of earnest and competent research not one clear sign of manlike life on Mars has been detected. Professor Lowell's famous Martian "canals," which for a long time were considered a probable sign of the intelligent direction of water, are now believed to be wide, shallow river valleys.
This lack of manlike life is precisely what a biologist would expect. Man and man's active mind are believed to be products of the Great Ice Age, for that time of stress and competition on earth is what is supposed to have turned mankind's anthropoid ancestors into men. The period of ice and cold over wide areas of the earth was caused, at least in part, by the elevation of continents and mountain ranges. On Mars, no mountain ranges exist, and it probably never had an Ice Age.
It is on these hypotheses that science bases its assumption that there is no human intelligence on Mars, and that animal life on the planet is still in the age of instinct. The thing to expect on Mars, then, is a fish life much like that on earth, the emergence of this fish life onto the land, and the evolution of these Martian land-fishes into retilelike creatures. Finally, animals resembling the earth's present rodents like rats, squirrels, and beavers would make their appearance.
The chief reason to expect this final change of Martian retiles into primitive mammals lies in the fact that on earth this evolution seems to have been forced by changeable weather. And Mars now possesses seasonal changes like those on earth.
Pure biological reasoning makes it probable, therefore, that the evolution of warm-blooded animals may have occurred on Mars much as it did here. There seems no reason to believe that Martian life has gone farther than that. Mars is a relatively changeless planet. Biologists suppose that the rise and fall of mountains, the increase and decrease in volcanic activity, and the ebb and flow of climate forced life on earth along its upward path. Martian life of recent ages seems to have lacked these natural incentives to better things.
Now, there is one creature on earth for the development of whose counterpart the supposed Martian conditions would be ideal. That animal is the beaver. It is either land-living or water-living. It has a fur coat to protect it from the 100 degrees below zero of the Martian night.
The Martian beavers, of course, would not be exactly like those on earth. That they would be furred and water-loving is probable. Their eyes might be larger than those of the earthly beaver because the sunlight is not so strong, and their bodies might be larger because of lesser Martian gravity. Competent digging tools certainly would be provided on their claws. The chests of these Martian beavers would be larger and their breathing far more active, as there is less oxygen in the air on Mars.
Such beaver-Martians are nothing more than pure speculation, but the idea is based upon the known facts that there is plenty of water on Mars; that vegetation almost certainly exists there; that Mars has no mountains and could scarcely have had an Ice Age; and that evidences of Martian life are not accompanied by signs of intelligence.
Herds of beaver-creatures are at least a more reasonable idea than the familiar fictional one of manlike Martians digging artificial water channels with vast machines or the still more fantastic notion of octopuslike Martians sufficiently intelligent to plan the conquest of the earth.
Dr. Antonio Longoria claimed that he had invented a death-ray. In tests it demonstrated the ability to kill pigeons at a distance of four miles. However, he destroyed his machine and vowed never to build another, insisting that he was “interested now only in doing something to help civilization.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/841e3/841e3f225ff245089f6635e8b67cf985b67b12a0" alt=""
Spokane Chronicle - Oct 11, 1939
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38d79/38d793bdf5fc6911b2883e141971966d259b3c30" alt=""
Tampa Tribune - Oct 13, 1939
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea5fd/ea5fda51cf4870b106d81e329f826a21662e4506" alt=""
Popular Science - Feb 1940
In the early 1930s, a new feature was introduced at some greyhound races: monkey jockeys. Apparently the crowds loved the idea. The problem was, the monkeys had trouble staying on the backs of the greyhounds. Animal trainer Rennie Renfro came up with a solution — a special harness that would tie the monkey onto the back of the dog.
Renfro patented his invention in 1933.
It probably made him some money, because I can find descriptions of races with monkey jockeys for decades afterwards.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/844aa/844aae76d6fab5779e78a1cd41b39e10fb424fc8" alt=""
Rennie Renfro (left) and his wife
St. Louis Post Dispatch - July 2, 1933
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa564/fa5645f883343c0d6ed3f98f6353d5c1a27b467e" alt=""
image source: Greyhound Articles Online