Comments
Maybe I should patent crotchless union suits. Aside from the obvious, they also make it far easier to visit the out-house in minus temperature.
Posted by BMN on 04/03/16 at 09:53 AM
Not quite zoot but definitely a suit.
Posted by Expat47 in Athens, Greece on 04/03/16 at 10:21 AM
As I recall, men's union suits of that period had a button-up flap in back of the derriere to facilitate doing #2 in the outhouse. (Of course, for #1, there was a fly in front.) I see no such flap in the ad, but maybe they left it out, out of a sense of decorum.
Posted by Joshua Zev Levin, Ph.D. on 04/03/16 at 10:59 AM
I would prefer 2 piece long johns for the reason mentioned.
Posted by Patty in Ohio, USA on 04/03/16 at 11:22 AM
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Category: Advertising | Underwear | 1910s | Women